SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
|[X]||Annual report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934|
|For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017;|
|[ ]||Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934|
For the transition period from _____________ to _____________
COMMISSION FILE NO. 1-11602
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|(State of Incorporation)||(IRS Employer Identification Number)|
701 Brickell Ave., Suite 1550, Miami, Florida 33131
(Address of principal executive office, including Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (844) 273-6462
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
|Title of each class||Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered|
|Class A Common Stock, $0.0001 par value||OTCQB|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained in this form and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|Large Accelerated Filer [ ]||Accelerated Filer [ ]|
|Non-accelerated Filer [ ]||Smaller Reporting Company [X]|
|(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)||Emerging Growth Company [ ]|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based upon the closing price of the Class A Common Stock on the OTCQB system on June 30, 2017 of $1.40, was approximately $1,370,000.
As of June 8, 2018, the registrant had 1,700,586 shares of Class A Common Stock (including 37,778 shares that are subject to forfeiture) and 1,436,052 shares of Class B Common Stock issued and outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference : No documents are incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|Item 1A.||Risk Factors.||9|
|Item 1B.||Unresolved Staff Comments.||10|
|Item 3.||Legal Proceedings.||10|
|Item 4.||Mine Safety Disclosures.||10|
|Item 5.||Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.||11|
|Item 6.||Selected Financial Data.||12|
|Item 7.||Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.||12|
|Item 7A.||Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.||16|
|Item 8.||Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.||16|
|Item 9.||Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.||42|
|Item 9A.||Controls and Procedures.||42|
|Item 9B.||Other Information.||43|
|Item 10.||Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.||44|
|Item 11.||Executive Compensation.||47|
|Item 12.||Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.||48|
|Item 13.||Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.||50|
|Item 14.||Principal Accounting Fees and Services.||50|
|Item 15.||Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.||51|
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document contains forward-looking statements about us and our industry that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this prospectus regarding our strategy, future operations, future financial position, future net sales, projected expenses, prospects and plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievement to be materially different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “project,” “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “can,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “objective,” or the negative of these terms, and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. However, not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views about future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Actual events or results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including the risk factors described in greater detail in the section entitled “Risk Factors.”
These forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report. Unless required by U.S. federal securities laws, we do not intend to update any of these forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the statement is made or to conform these statements to actual results.
Item 1. Business
PEN develops, commercializes and markets consumer and industrial products enabled by nanotechnology that solve everyday problems for customers in the optical, transportation, military, sports and safety industries. Our primary business is the formulation, marketing and sale of products enabled by nanotechnology including the ULTRA CLARITY brand eyeglass cleaner, CLARITY DEFOGIT brand defogging products and CLARITY ULTRASEAL nanocoating products for glass and ceramics. We also sell an environmentally friendly surface protector, fortifier, and cleaner. Our design center conducts product development services for us and for government and private customers and develops and sells printable inks and pastes, thermal management materials, and graphene foils and windows.
PEN was formed in 2014, and it is the successor to Applied Nanotech Holdings Inc. that had been formed in 1989. In the combination that created PEN, Nanofilm, Ltd. acquired Applied Nanotech Holdings, Inc. Our principal operating segments coincide with our different business activities and types of products sold. This is consistent with our internal reporting structure. Our two reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were (i) the Product segment and (ii) the Contract services segment (which we formerly called the Research and development segment).
Revenue is based on the retail and institutional sale of specialty products utilizing nanotechnology to deliver unique performance attributes at the surfaces of a wide variety of substrates. Our consumer products are sold as liquids, gels, foam and as wet and dry towelettes. Institutional products are sold in liquid form enabling application by a variety of common commercial techniques We rely on intellectual property including trade secret formulations to protect our proprietary technology.
We have three broad product technology platforms that offer solutions to some common problems such as ease of cleaning, preventing fogging, preventing accumulation of dirt or grime, improving resistance to scuffing and wear. All our products have some “nano” characteristic about them – whether it is being active at the molecular level, incorporation of submicron-particles, or creating very thin, self-assembling coatings that are 20 nanometers or less in thickness.
One line of consumer products center on our customized optical cleaning and de-fogging treatments. Another line of consumer products focuses on creating hygienic surfaces unfriendly to germs. In our consumer products, we strive to create segment leading brands that are sustainable, of high quality, and that are both easy and safe to apply. Institutional products include a family of coating liquids that create very thin, strongly-bound, clear coatings on surfaces used for glass and ceramic surface and a series of clear coatings for plastics incorporating submicron size particles to improve abrasion resistance and wear resistance without sacrificing transparency. We manufacture our formulations internally to protect our technology and maintain the highest quality for the products that we and our commercial partners bring to the marketplace.
Our products encompass:
|●||Liquid and towelette formulations packaged for retail sale to consumers for eyeglass and sunglass lens cleaning and protection.|
|●||Liquid formulation packaged for retail and institutional sale for cleaning and creating hygienic surfaces unfriendly to germs.|
|●||Anti-fogging liquid and towelette formulations packaged for retail sale to consumers for safety glasses, protective eye wear including face shields, and sporting goggles.|
|●||Anti-fogging towelettes for sale to the military for safety, anti-fogging and conditioning of lenses, masks, head gear and other applications such as head’s up displays,|
|●||Mar resistant and stain resistant coatings for high end vitreous china tableware used for heavy duty, usage situations such as restaurants, cruise ships, casinos.|
|●||Clear protective coatings used on display panels and touch screens to make it easy to remove fingerprints. Applications include automotive and hand-held devices.|
|●||Protective and water repelling coatings on interior glass and ceramic surfaces to make it easy to clean and prevent scale and grime encrustation.|
|●||Coatings for ceramic insulators used in transit and underground subways systems to prevent caking of metal dust and greases on surfaces to reduce maintenance and current leakage losses.|
We also believe that products enabled by nanotechnology can tackle and solve big, global problems in selected growing markets. We have three primary areas of new product focus:
|1.||Health: Treating or printing of surfaces at the nano-scale to promote health, fight the spread of disease, and assist in the arms race against superbugs;|
|2.||Safety: “Smelling” at the nano-scale level to identify hazardous conditions, alert those in danger, and initiate steps to prevent catastrophe; and|
|3.||Sustainability: Creating nano-scale devices and formulas using the minimal amounts of safe, natural ingredients and manufacturing methods, and avoiding using harsh chemicals and pesticides, whenever possible.|
In 2016, we introduced into the institutional market a hygienic product that creates surfaces unfriendly to germs. This is expected to be part of a family of cleaning products that protect and fortify surfaces at the nanoscale-level. The patent-pending product is a spray that cleans, penetrates and fortifies the surface. The product is safe for use on many surfaces, both natural and man-made. After application, the product continues to fortify and protect, keeping a clean and healthy surface.
Our product is made with safe ingredients and does not use harsh chemicals or disinfectants. We start with a natural mineral that is milled and engineered into a smaller shape and size. Then, the milled mineral is mixed with a proprietary cleaner solution to create our product. The mineral chosen is stable in air and water. No governmental approvals are required for sale of this product. The product:
|●||Rids the surface of dust, dirt and debris;|
|●||Leaves a healthy surface|
|●||Is safe to use|
|●||Continues to work after application;|
|●||Is easy to apply;|
|●||Is environmentally friendly;|
|●||Is odor free; and|
|●||Is stain free.|
We believe that our manufacturing capacity and contractors with whom we have established relationships will enable us to fill orders for the new product. Ingredients and packaging materials are readily available from a number of suppliers.
Marketing and Distribution
We sell our consumer products directly to retailers in the United States and work with outside agents and distributors. Our industrial products are sold directly to customers who frequently use our products in their own branded products.
We do a limited amount of packaging and labeling at our 26,000-square foot facility in Brooklyn Heights Ohio. Most of our production is done by third-party contract bottlers and package manufacturers in the United States.
Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights
Our nanotechnology expertise and related intellectual property used in our current products is specialized in the areas of surface science, molecular self-assembly, transparent composites, and surfactants. The intellectual property developed from this work is protected with a combination of selective patents and primarily by trade secrets. This intellectual property strategy is like that used by leading companies in the fragrance and flavors industry. No single patent is significant to any of our commercial products.
Products sold into the optical segment have a small number of significant competitors. Our products are known to be the “benchmark” products in these segments and generally outperform our competitors’. Some of our products in these segments do compete for certain customers or certain applications against lower priced, traditional materials. Most of the companies selling products into these market segments are privately-held, U.S. packaging or catalog companies. Examples in the U.S. include Hilco Accessories, California Accessories, and Amcon Laboratories and, internationally, the catalog company, Prosben, Inc., from the Peoples Republic of China. In the nano-coating products area or the anti-fog product line we are not aware of any competitive products that match our product performance or processing characteristics.
Products sold into the hygienic, germ-unfriendly market have a diverse variety of potential competitors. Potential competitors fall into the general category of germ-killing cleaners, known as disinfectants. These disinfectants rely on the use of government-approved pesticides as their active ingredient. Examples include bleach, benzalkonium chloride, and alcohols. All disinfectant products require the use of protective gloves and masks for their safe use. Examples in the U.S. include the Clorox Company, GOJO Industries, Inc., and Reckitt Benckiser, Inc. Since our products do not include germ-killing pesticides and do not require protective clothing, it is unclear how customers will perceive our products as compared to these potential competitors.
Sales are primarily pursuant to purchase orders for delivery of products. We do not believe that a backlog as of any date is indicative of future results. Some agreements give customers the right to purchase a specific quantity of products during a specified period, but these agreements do not obligate the customers to purchase any minimum quantity. The quantities purchased by the customer, as well as the shipment schedules, are frequently revised during the agreement term to reflect changes in the customer’s needs. Because of our relatively small size, a customer’s delay of a product shipment can make a difference in the results for an accounting period.
All long-lived assets are in the United States.
Sources and availability of raw materials and the names of principal suppliers
We use third-party suppliers and contract manufacturers in the United States to obtain substantially all raw materials, components and packaging products. Over time, one unrelated third party has become our leading supplier in the United States. As is customary in our industry, historically we have not had long-term or exclusive agreements with third-party suppliers or contract manufacturers and have generally made purchases through purchase orders. Due to to our decision to utilize toll packaging companies in the manufacture of many of our products, we now have a one year contract with one supplier giving that supplier substantially exclusive rights to two of our SKUs. We believe that we have good relationships with our suppliers and manufacturers and that there are alternative sources should one or more of these suppliers or manufacturers become unavailable. However, the disruption of our operations if a change becomes necessary and the likelihood of shipment delays means that the loss of, or a significant adverse change in our relationship with, any of our key suppliers or manufacturers, or any other supply change disruptions could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
A limited number of key customers account for a substantial portion of our commercial revenue. Revenues from two customers constituted approximately 27% and 12% of 2017 total revenue, and 30% and 14% of 2016 total revenue. Many of our customers are significantly larger than we are and, therefore, may be able to exert a high degree of influence over us. The loss of one of the largest customers or the failure to attract new customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Contract Services Segment
Our Contract services segment functions as the Design center for our new products as well as performing work for government agencies and private strategic partners. Formerly called the research and development segment, this segment has moved away from areas of research that do not involve product development, especially government contracts that require us to fund part of the research cost. This segment is now involved in proof of concepts and prototypes for proposed PEN products and development work under contract for government and private entities. In our work on products for PEN we focus only on submicron size particles, not smaller nanoparticles that are subject to much greater government regulation. Our work generally falls under one of three technology platforms:
|●||Submicron particle formulations and materials for health and safety products.|
Much of our contract product development work is done under government contracts. Government contracts frequently limit profit on work done. With private development contracts, there is a relationship between revenues received under the contract and rights granted to the licensee under the contract. Our short-term goal when we work for others is to cover all out of pocket costs and contribute to our overall overhead. Our long-term goal is to become a trusted supplier of products to our development partners.
We have had small scale success with commercial sales of conductive inks and pastes and from thermal management materials. Our graphene foils are also sold commercially but the size of the market is small. Product sales typically come from repeat business or from customer inquiries in our areas of expertise.
We continue to focus on stabilizing our financial situation and operating this segment at break-even or better based solely on revenues from our development activities.
Nanoelectronics Applications – Inks and Pastes
Metallic Inks & Pastes
Copper Inks - As flexible electronics grow, soldering is disappearing. New digital and additive manufacturing processes allow industries to move from the design process directly to the production line. We believe that only submicron particles are capable of producing inks that are compatible with the nozzles used in digital printing.
We sell copper inks and pastes to a variety of customers around the world. Certain of our products based on nano-copper are available only outside Asia under agreements with our former research partner Ishihara Chemical Company, Ltd., that has exclusive rights in Asia to patents developed under research contracts with them. Other copper products that we sell are available worldwide.
Other metallic inks – Our technology and development work in conductive inks also resulted in conductive inks and pastes using nickel, silver, and aluminum rather than copper. Research partners who funded some of our work using silver and aluminum have exclusive rights to certain products for solar applications. We are not restricted in using products for other applications, and we can sell into the solar field our products that do not infringe those specific patents.
There are silver inks on the market today, but because of the high cost of silver relative to copper, a successful copper or copper-alloy ink is likely to be of greater commercial interest to potential customers. Most inks and pastes sold in commercial quantities today are manufactured and sold by large multinational chemical companies. For example, the two largest suppliers of inks and pastes for solar cell production are DuPont and Ferro. We are unable to compete directly with companies of that size in established silver ink markets.
Technical Inks Printing Solution (TIPS)
Conductive inks have the potential to revolutionize many types of electronics manufacturing. Our strategy is to provide a comprehensive solution for end users not just by developing inks, but assisting in the process from start to finish. We call this our Technical Inks Printing Solution. We have also formed relationships with hardware manufacturers with the goal of providing seamless integration into high volume manufacturing for companies wishing to use conductive inks in their manufacturing processes. In addition to traditional 2D printing applications, we developed a multifunctional copper ink for 3D printing applications, the fastest growing segment of printed electronics.
Numerous other companies are working with other technologies for the commercial use of conductive inks and pastes. The commercialization of products using our technology depends on the results of our development work compared with results achieved by others, as well as other factors including raw material costs, marketing, resources, and production capabilities.
Our approach to sensor technology offers the unique advantage of recognizing and sometimes measuring materials at the molecular level. Our competition in the sensor area will come from a variety of technologies and companies depending on the purpose and use of the sensor. The areas where we are currently active are:
Ion Mobility Sensors. We are developing sensors based on Ion Mobility Sensor (“IMS”) technology focusing on Differential Mobility Spectroscopy (“DMS”). These sensors are ideal for use when both high sensitivity and high selectivity (low false positives) are required. We have improved on existing IMS and DMS technology by developing our proprietary nonradioactive gas ionization sources to replace the radioactive isotopes that are traditionally used in these tools.
We are also working on sensors for detection of citrus greening disease with collaboration from the California Citrus Research Board and funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”).
Hydrogen and Methane Sensors. Hydrogen sensors were initially targeted for use in fuel cells for automobiles and for remote monitoring of large power transformers. We developed a hydrogen sensor for use in the measurement of hydrogen in power transformer products. Currently, we are not aware of commercial interest in hydrogen sensors.
Methane gas detectors that we developed for use in the natural gas industry under funding from the Northeast Gas Association have achieved UL 1484 certification for Residential Gas Detectors. In 2017, the Northeast Gas Association began a field test of these sensors that is ongoing.
Carbon Monoxide Sensors. We have developed a low-power carbon monoxide sensor that can last for 10,000 hours on a single battery. The sensor will be specific to carbon monoxide with no cross sensitivity to other gases and elements and is also easily portable and highly sensitive.
Submicron Particle Formulations and Materials for Health and Safety Applications
Our work in the health and safety area builds on our understanding of certain compounds from our extensive work related to inks and pastes. The understanding of the chemistry of these particles and their interaction with surfactants and other solutions was combined with research and development work done for products already sold commercially resulted in new product concepts and materials with superior properties for applications in the field of health and safety.
Using our experience with metallic inks and our prior work with carbon nanotube composites we developed a new thin carbon foil made of layers of graphene for use in cyclotron accelerators that produce nuclear pharmaceuticals used by the medical field in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging. We supply graphene foil to institutional customers who make nuclear pharmaceuticals, and our partners are testing our graphene windows for use in their equipment. The extent to which our partners are successful in the nuclear pharmaceutical marketplace is outside our control.
Intellectual Property Rights
An important part of our overall business and product development strategy is to protect our intellectual property and, when appropriate, we seek patent protection for our products and proprietary technology. Historically, we made filings in the United States and selected foreign jurisdictions. Beginning in 2014, as a cost saving measure, we became much more selective in filing patents and reduced the number of jurisdictions where we act to protect our rights. Still, our patent portfolio consists of approximately 40 patents, including issued patents and patent applications pending before foreign and United States Patent and Trademark Offices. Trade secret protection is also important to our products.
The patenting of technology-related products and processes involves uncertain and complex legal and factual questions. The legal standards change from time to time, and administrative and court interpretations are not always consistent in one jurisdiction, or across different jurisdictions. Therefore, there is no assurance that our pending United States and foreign applications will issue, or what scope of protection any issued patents will provide, or whether any such patents ultimately will be upheld as valid by a court of competent jurisdiction in the event of a legal challenge. Interference proceedings, to determine priority of invention, also could arise in any of our pending patent applications. The costs of such proceedings would be significant and an unfavorable outcome could result in the loss of rights to the invention at issue in the proceedings. If we fail to obtain patents, there can be no assurance that we can protect our rights in the technology, or that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary products and techniques, or otherwise gain access to our technology.
Competitors have filed applications for, or have been issued patents, and may obtain additional patents and proprietary rights relating to products or processes used in, necessary to, competitive with, or otherwise related to, our patents. The scope and validity of these patents, and the extent to which we may be required to obtain licenses under these patents or under other proprietary rights and the cost and availability of licenses is unknown. This may limit our ability to use and to license our technology. Litigation concerning these or other patents could be protracted and expensive. If suit were brought against us for patent infringement, we could potentially challenge the validity of the other patent but would need to overcome a presumption of validity. If we were found to infringe and the patent was held valid (or was unchallenged), there can be no assurance that the prevailing party would grant us a license. Even if a license were available, the payments that would be required are unknown and could materially reduce the value of our interest in the affected products.
We also rely upon unpatented trade secrets. No assurance can be given that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or disclose such technology or that we can meaningfully protect our rights to our unpatented trade secrets.
We require our employees, directors, consultants, outside scientific collaborators, sponsored researchers, and other advisors to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of employment or consulting relationships with us. These agreements provide that all confidential information developed or made known to the individual through the relationship is to be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties except in specific circumstances. In the case of employees and some consultants, the agreements provide that all inventions conceived by the individual while working for us will be our property. There is no assurance, however, that these agreements will provide sufficient protection for our trade secrets in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of such information.
A portion of our revenue in the Contract services segment consists of reimbursement of expenditures under U.S. government contracts. Our revenue from government contracts was $750,160 and $807,823 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These reimbursements represent all or a portion of the costs associated with such contracts. As of December 31, 2017, we have several government contracts in process that have approximately $809,047 of revenue yet to be recognized. Government contracts are subject to delays and risk of cancellation. Also, government contractors generally are subject to various kinds of audits and investigations by government agencies. These audits and investigations involve review of a contractor’s performance on its contracts, as well as its pricing practices, the costs incurred and compliance with all laws, regulations and standards. We have been audited by the government, with no material changes, and we do not expect the results of any government audit to have a significant effect on our operations or our financial statements.
Research and Development
Research and development activity is the driver for our new products and improvement of existing products. Research and development costs incurred in the development of the Company’s products was $286,395 for the year ended December 31, 2017. Research and development costs were $290,402 for 2016. This represented approximately 9.6% and 8.2% of our total operating costs in each of those years. The ability to engineer product performance using nanotechnology is one of the ways we distinguish our products in marketing and sales of our products. Product research and development work includes development and refinement of formulas, engineering of liquid formulas that can be applied both by hand and by machine, optimization for a variety of performance characteristics, testing and characterization, and work on manufacturing processes and techniques both for producing the product, and for a customer’s use of the product.
Compliance with Environmental Laws
Our operations must satisfy governmental safety standards. Applicable safety standards are established by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”), pollution control standards by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and other state and local regulations, including foreign regulation for products manufactured or shipped outside the U.S. Some of our research work, and products developed may also be subject to regulation under the Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act administered by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (“CDRH”) of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. We take these requirements into account in product development. Cost of compliance with these regulations has not been significant in the past and we do not expect it to be material in the future.
OSHA, the EPA, the CDRH and other governmental agencies, both in the United States, the states where we or our customers sell products, and foreign countries, may adopt additional rules and regulations that may affect us and products using our technology. The cost of compliance with these regulations has not been significant to us in the past and is not expected to be material in the future. Changing regulations can affect our customers, and we have in the past, and may be required in the future, to reformulate or change packaging to address regulatory issues. This can affect timing of sales which may be significant in an accounting period.
As of December 31, 2017, we had 15 full-time employees. We do not anticipate the need to hire significant additional employees to support our existing business. If product sales increase, or we begin to see commercial sales of new products, we plan to hire additional employees in sales and marketing. We are not subject to any collective bargaining agreements, and we consider our relations with our employees to be good.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2. Properties.
We lease facilities in three locations. Our headquarters is in leased space in Miami, Florida. Our leased space in Austin, Texas is used primarily by our Contract services segment. Leased office, warehouse, manufacturing and laboratory space in Brooklyn Heights, Ohio is used by our Product segment. These facilities are adequate for our current needs.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities .
Our Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value, trades on the OTCQB system under the symbol “PENC”. The following table sets forth, on a per share basis for the periods indicated, the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by that system. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions. On January 26, 2016, we effected a 1-for-180 reverse stock split of our common stock and the prices reported below have been retroactively adjusted to give effect to the reverse stock split.
As of May 25, 2018, the closing sale price for our Class A common stock as reported on the OTCQB system was $0.95 per share. As of that date, there were approximately 344 shareholders of record for our Class A common stock and three holders of record of our Class B common stock. This does not include beneficial owners holding Class A common stock in street name in brokerage accounts. As of our last record of total shareholders, including those holding stock in street name, there were approximately 5,115 shareholders.
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock, have no plans to pay any dividends, and it is unlikely that we will pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to invest future earnings, if any, to finance expansion of our business. Any payment of cash dividends in the future will be dependent upon our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, and other factors determined by our board of directors.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
On February 24, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 3,846 shares of Class A common stock and 2,564 shares of Class B common stock to the Company’s directors as payment for their service on the Company’s board. These shares were valued on the date of grant at $1.56 per share based on the quoted price of the stock for a total value of $10,000.
On April 28, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 10,000 shares of Class A common stock and 12,308 shares of Class B common stock to the Company’s directors as payment for their service on the Company’s board. These shares are valued were valued on the date of grant of April 28, 2017 at $1.30 per share based on the quoted price of the stock for a total value of $29,000.
On July 28, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,800 shares of Class A common stock and 3,200 shares of Class B common stock to the Company’s directors as payment for their service on the Company’s board. These shares were valued on the date of grant at $1.25 per share based on the quoted closing price of the stock for a total value of $10,000.
On November 17, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,614 shares of Class A common stock and 3,076 shares of Class B common stock to the Company’s directors as compensation to them for service on our board. These shares were valued on that date at $1.30 per share based on the quoted price of the stock for a total value of $9,999.
On February 28, 2018, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,443 shares of Class A common stock and 2,962 shares of Class B common stock to the Company’s directors as compensation to them for service on its board. These shares were valued on that date at $1.35 per share based on the quoted price of the stock for a total value of $10,000. On that same day, the Company issued 6,476 shares of Class B common stock in satisfaction of the outstanding equity credits.
On May 23, 2018, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,043 shares of Class A common stock and 3,362 shares of Class B common stock to the Company’s directors as compensation to them for service on our board. These shares were valued on that date at $0.19 per share based on the quoted price of the stock for a total value of $10,000.
The issuances of these shares were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) and 3(a)(9).
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The table below sets out as of December 31, 2017 the number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (column (a)), the weighted average exercise price of those options, warrants and rights (column (b)), and other than the securities to be issued upon the exercise of the outstanding options, warrants and rights, the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under the plan (column (c)).
securities to be
exercise price of
|Approved by stockholders||Restricted Stock Agreement with Mr. Yaniv (1)||37,778||-||-|
|Not approved by stockholders||2002 and 2012 Equity Compensation Plans and 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (2)||19,120||$||41.77||83,827|
|Equity Credit Program and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (3)||-||-||-|
|(1)||The Restricted Stock Agreement with Mr. Yaniv was approved by an advisory vote of the stockholders on August 22, 2014. Under the Restricted Stock Agreement as adjusted for the reverse stock split that was effective in January 2016, he holds 37,778 shares of our Class A common stock, subject to forfeiture (the “Forfeiture Restrictions”) which expire upon the first to occur of (i) a change in control of the company, (ii) the death of Mr. Yaniv, or (iii) if more than 180 days after closing the average trading price of the shares during a measurement period of ten consecutive trading days reaches certain price thresholds. At a $18 price, 5,554 shares vest, with additional tranches of 5,556 shares vesting if the price reaches $27, $36, $45, and $54. The last 10,000 shares vest at a $63 price threshold. Any shares with respect to which the Forfeiture Restrictions have not expired by the fifth anniversary of the date of award will be forfeited.|
|(2)||The 2002 Equity Compensation Plan was approved by a wide majority of the shareholders casting votes at each of the 2010, 2008, and 2007 annual meetings of shareholders. However, since less than 50% of the shares eligible to vote cast votes at each meeting, the plan does not fall into the category of plans approved by shareholders under SEC rules. The 2002 Equity Compensation Plan expired in March 2012 and no future options can be granted under the plan. In April 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors established the 2012 Equity Compensation Plan. All options granted under both plans were priced at the fair market value of our common stock, or greater, on the date of grant and have a life of up to ten (10) years from their date of grant, subject to earlier termination as set forth in the plan. Adjusted for the reverse stock split that was effective January 26, 2016, a total of 27,778 options were authorized under the 2012 plan. The 2015 Equity Incentive Plan was adopted by the Board on November 30, 2015. The Plan permits stock awards as well as option grants. Under this Plan we can make stock grants or option grants. If awards expire unexercised, or restricted shares are forfeited, those shares are again available for grant under the Plan. See the further description of this Plan in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.|
|(3)||There are 8,250 equity credits outstanding on December 31, 2017 that entitle the holder to receive shares of our Common Stock under certain circumstances. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details related to the issuance of 6,476 shares of Class B common stock associated with the redemption of 8,250 equity credits. See the description of the Equity Credit Program in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. No further Equity Credits are issuable under the Program. The PEN Brands LLC Stock Appreciation Rights Plan will, under certain circumstances, result in the issuance of shares of our common stock. The number of rights that will be issued under that Plan will be determined at the time of our first registered offering based on the price of the shares and therefore the number of shares to be issued is not calculable. See the description of that Plan in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.|
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.
The following is management’s discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected our financial position and operating results during the periods included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
PEN develops, commercializes and markets consumer and industrial products enabled by nanotechnology that solve everyday problems for customers in the optical, transportation, military, sports and safety industries. Our primary business is the formulation, marketing and sale of products enabled by nanotechnology including the ULTRA CLARITY brand eyeglass cleaner, CLARITY DEFOGIT brand defogging products and CLARITY ULTRASEAL nanocoating products for glass and ceramics. We also sell an environmentally friendly surface protector, fortifier, and cleaner. Our design center conducts development services for us and for government and private customers and develops and sells printable inks and pastes, thermal management materials, and graphene foils and windows.
Our principal operating segments coincide with the types of products to be sold. The products from which revenues are derived are consistent with the reporting structure of the Company’s internal organization. The Company’s two reportable segments for the year ended December 31, 2017 and for the 2016 period were (i) the Product segment and (ii) the Contract services segment.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following comparative analysis on results of operations was based primarily on the comparative consolidated financial statements, footnotes and related information for the periods identified below and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements that are included elsewhere in this report. The results discussed below are for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Comparison of Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, revenues consisted of the following:
|Year Ended December 31,|
|Contract services segment||1,005,647||1,003,710|
|Total segment and consolidated sales||$||7,878,099||$||8,115,657|
For the year ended December 31, 2017, sales from the Product segment decreased by $239,495, or 3%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. This was primarily attributable to reduced sales volume of our optical cleaners and reduced volume of sales for anti-fog products to our traditional customers and delays in putting our products into other channels.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, revenues of our Contract services segment were essentially flat as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.
Cost of revenues
Cost of revenues includes inventory costs, materials and supplies costs, internal labor and related benefits, subcontractor costs, depreciation, overhead and shipping and handling costs incurred including costs related to government and private contracts in our Contract services segment.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, cost of revenues increased by $300,093, or 6%. These consisted of the following:
|Year Ended December 31,|
|Cost of revenues:|
|Contract services segment||1,096,745||1,097,891|
|Total segment and consolidated cost of revenues||$||5,610,063||$||5,309,970|
Gross profit and gross margin
For the year ended December 31, 2017, gross profit amounted to $2,268,036 as compared to $2,805,687 for the year ended December 31, 2016, a decrease of $537,651, or 19%. The decrease was due to reduced revenue at the top line without corresponding reductions in cost of revenue. While revenue was down, the reduction in labor cost lagged and hurt margin in the product segment. Profitability in the Contract services segment was negative reflecting the final work being done on government contracts that required the service provider to absorb some of the cost of the work. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, gross margins were 28.8% and 34.6%, respectively.
Gross profit and gross margin by segment and totals are as follows:
|Year Ended December 31,|
|Product segment *||$||2,359,134||34.3||%||$||2,899,868||40.8||%|
|Contract services segment *||(91,098||)||(9.1||)%||(94,181||)||(9.4||)%|
|Total gross profit||$||2,268,036||28.8||%||$||2,805,687||34.6||%|
|*||Gross margin % based on respective segments sales.|
For the year ended December 31, 2017, operating expenses amounted to $2,987,913 as compared to $3,552,707 for the year ended December 31, 2016, a decrease of $564,794, or 16%. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, operating expenses consisted of the following:
|Year Ended December 31,|
|Selling and marketing expenses||$||285,147||$||220,029|
|Salaries, wages and related benefits||957,954||1,513,536|
|Research and development||286,395||290,402|
|General and administrative expenses||813,448||1,015,503|
|●||For the year ended December 31, 2017, selling and marketing expenses decreased by $65,118, or 30%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily attributable to reduced commission payments.|
|●||For the year ended December 31, 2017, salaries, wages and related benefits decreased by $555,582, or 37%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. These decreases were attributable to personnel reductions related to our ongoing efforts to reduce costs as well as the increased use of contract manufacturers who process our inventory at their facilities in the Product segment.|
For the year ended December 31, 2017, research and development costs were essentially flat, decreasing by $4,007, or 1%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, professional fees increased by $131,732, or 26%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was due to services for executive consultants and sales consultants in the Product segment.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, general and administrative expenses decreased by $202,055, or 20%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease the year ended December 31, 2017 was attributable to several factors including the end of amortization of intangibles, and personnel reductions with associated general and administrative expenses
Loss from operations
As a result of the factors described above, for the year ended December 31, 2017, loss from operations amounted to $719,877 as compared to a loss from operations of $747,020 for the year ended December 31, 2016, an improvement of $27,143, or 4%.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, total other income amounted to $32,809 as compared to other income of $191,019 for the year ended December 31, 2016, a decrease of $158,210, or 83%. The decrease in 2017 as compared to 2016 was primarily attributable to a loss on settlement of $80,000 associated with a settlement agreement with a former employee as well as a loss on the sale of property, plant and equipment, net of $33,677 in 2017 associated with the relocation of the Product segment operations as compared to a gain on the sale of property, plant and equipment, net of $23,586 in 2016, a change of $57,263.
As a result of the foregoing, for the year ended December 31, 2017, net loss amounted to $687,068 as compared to a net loss of $556,001 for the year ended December 31, 2016, an increase of $131,067, or 24%.
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, net loss amounted to $(0.22) per common share (basic and diluted), and $(0.18) per common share (basic and diluted), respectively.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity is the ability of an enterprise to generate adequate amounts of cash to meet its needs for cash requirements. We had a working capital deficit of $1,345,095 and unrestricted cash of $138,296 as of December 31, 2017.
The following table sets forth a summary of changes in our working capital from December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2017:
|December 31, 2017||December 31, 2016||
|Working capital (deficit):|
|Total current assets||$||1,751,382||$||2,033,026||$||(281,644||)||(13.85||)%|
|Total current liabilities||3,096,477||3,105,717||(9,240||)||(0.30||)%|
|Working capital (deficit):||$||(1,345,095||)||$||(1,072,691||)||$||(272,404||)||(25.39||)%|
The change in working capital was in part because of a reduction in current assets when comparing December 31, 2016 with December 31, 2017. The biggest part of that change was a reduction in inventory because in 2016 we were building inventory in anticipation of customer orders that we filled in 2017. The work with contract manufacturers that was new in 2017, especially in the last quarter, meant there was no comparable inventory build in 2017. Current liabilities also increased. Accounts payable were higher at December 31, 2017 as compared to December 31, 2016 because of expenses related to the move of the Product segment operations. The amount outstanding under the revolving line of credit was down in part because of the reduced inventory and a corresponding reduction in the borrowing base, but was partially offset by advances from related parties.
These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. Management cannot provide assurance that we will ultimately achieve profitable operations or become cash flow positive, or raise additional debt and/or equity capital. Our principal future uses of cash are for working capital requirements, including sales and marketing expenses, legal and other professional fees, capital expenditures and reduction of accrued liabilities. These uses will depend on numerous factors including our sales and other revenues, and our ability to control costs. Recently, we have financed our working capital needs primarily through internally generated funds, and bank loans. We collect cash from our customers based on our sales to them and their respective payment terms. Over the past year we have reduced the scope of our operations to reduce our costs and enable us to operate without raising additional capital, although there can be no assurance that additional capital will not be needed in future periods. We will continue to look for opportunities to raise funds to permit us to increase the marketing of our products.
Our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP, which contemplate our continuation as a going concern and the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The carrying amounts of assets and liabilities presented in the consolidated financial statements do not necessarily purport to represent realizable or settlement values. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustment that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $438,558 for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to net cash provided in operating activities of $444,453 for the year ended December 31, 2016, a change of $5,895, or 1%.
|●||Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily reflected a net loss of $687,068, partially offset by the add-back of non-cash items totaling $328,972, and $796,654 provided by changes in operating assets and liabilities.|
|●||Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily reflected a net loss of $556,001, partially offset by the add-back of non-cash items totaling $364,245, and $636,209 provided by changes in operating assets and liabilities.|
Net cash provided by investing activities was $165,906 for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to cash provided by investing activities of $19,586 for the year ended December 31, 2016. In both periods, the proceeds from sales of property and equipment exceeded the cost of equipment purchases.
Net cash used in financing activities was $560,293 for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to net cash used by financing activities of $537,430 for the year ended December 31, 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we paid down $578,645 more than we received under the line of credit and repaid other debt in the amount of $96,648, partially offset by proceeds of $115,000 from advances from related parties. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we paid down $504,231 more than we received under the line of credit and repaid other debt in the amount of $81,199.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our critical accounting policies are included in Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies of our consolidated financial statements included within this Annual Report.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Our recently issued accounting standards are included in Note 2 - Significant Accounting Policies of our consolidated financial statements included within this Annual Report.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We have not entered into any other financial guarantees or other commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. We have not entered into any derivative contracts that are indexed to our shares and classified as shareholder’s equity or that are not reflected in our consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity. We do not have any variable interest in any unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit support to us or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
PEN INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017 and 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm||18|
|Consolidated Financial Statements:|
|Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016||19|
|Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016||20|
|Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016||21|
|Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016||22|
|Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements||23|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pen Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows, for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a net loss and cash provided by operating activities of $687,068 and $438,558, respectively, in 2017 and has a working capital deficit, stockholders’ deficit and accumulated deficit of $1,345,095, $1,096,005 and $6,587,235, respectively, at December 31, 2017. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s Plan in regards to these matters is also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Salberg & Company, P.A.
SALBERG & COMPANY, P.A.
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013.
Boca Raton, Florida
June 15, 2018
PEN INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|Accounts receivable, net||607,632||722,845|
|Accounts receivable - related party||14,226||10,474|
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets||162,246||75,080|
|Total Current Assets||1,751,382||2,033,026|
|Property, plant and equipment, net||388,777||709,627|
|LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT|
|Accounts payable - related parties||19,887||19,887|
|Accrued expenses and other current liabilities||649,974||937,166|
|Bank revolving line of credit||563,218||979,688|
|Current portion of notes payable||96,533||90,449|
|Advances from related parties||115,000||-|
|Total Current Liabilities||3,096,477||3,105,717|
|Notes payable, net of current portion||180,803||266,110|
|Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 11)|
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized;
no shares issued and outstanding
Class A common stock: $0.0001 par value, 7,200,000 shares authorized;
1,653,322 and 1,367,431 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively
Class B common stock: $0.0001 par value, 2,500,000 shares authorized;
1,423,252 and 1,402,104 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively
Class Z common stock: $0.0001 par value, 300,000 shares authorized;
0 and 262,631 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively
|Additional paid-in capital||5,490,923||5,321,769|
|Total Stockholders’ Deficit||(1,096,005||)||(578,096||)|
|Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit||$||2,181,275||$||2,793,731|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
PEN INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|For the Years Ended|
|Products (including related party sales of $168,255 and $177,747 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively)||$||6,872,452||$||7,111,947|
|COST OF REVENUES:|
|Total Cost of Revenues||5,610,063||5,309,970|
|Selling and marketing expenses||285,147||220,029|
|Salaries, wages and related benefits||957,954||1,513,536|
|Research and development||286,395||290,402|
|General and administrative expenses||813,448||1,015,503|
|Total Operating Expenses||2,987,913||3,552,707|
|LOSS FROM OPERATIONS||(719,877||)||(747,020||)|
|OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME:|
|(Loss) gain on sale of property, plant and equipment, net||(33,677||)||23,586|
|Loss on settlement||(80,000||)||-|
|Other income, net||216,779||272,523|
|Total Other Income||32,809||191,019|
|NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:|
|WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
PEN INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016
|Balance, December 31, 2015||1,336,759||$||134||1,395,678||$||139||262,631||$||26||$||5,071,532||$||(5,344,166||)||$||(272,335||)|
|Common stock issued for cash, net of issuance costs (1)||17,793||2||-||-||-||-||47,998||-||48,000|
|Common stock issued for services||10,351||-||6,426||1||-||-||36,999||-||37,000|
|Accretion of Class A shares issuable based on market conditions||-||-||-||-||-||-||165,240||-||165,240|
|Rounding shares from reverse stock split||2,528||-||-||-||-||-||-||-||-|
|Balance, December 31, 2016||1,367,431||136||1,402,104||140||262,631||26||5,321,769||(5,900,167||)||(578,096||)|
|Common stock issued in satisfaction of accrued director fees||5,383||1||9,230||1||-||-||18,998||-||19,000|
|Common stock issued for services||17,877||2||11,918||1||-||-||39,996||-||39,999|
|Conversion of Class Z shares into Class A shares||262,631||26||-||-||(262,631||)||(26||)||-||-||-|
|Accretion of Class A shares issuable based on market conditions||-||-||-||-||-||-||110,160||-||110,160|
|Balance, December 31, 2017||1,653,322||$||165||1,423,252||$||142||-||$||-||$||5,490,923||$||(6,587,235||)||$||(1,096,005||)|
|(1)||Includes cash issuance costs of $2,000|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
PEN INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|For the Years Ended|
|CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES|
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:|
|Change in inventory obsolescence reserve||18,802||56,861|
|Bad debt expense||5,067||12,021|
|Depreciation and amortization expense||121,267||182,986|
|Amortization of deferred lease incentives||-||12,830|
|Loss (gain) on sale of property, plant and equipment, net||33,677||(23,586||)|
|Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment||-||8,745|
|Gain on settlement of accounts payable||-||(50,879||)|
|Gain on settlement of accrued salary||-||(36,973||)|
|Change in operating assets and liabilities:|
|Accounts receivable - related party||(3,752||)||1,510|
|Prepaid expenses and other assets||(77,204||)||100,895|
|Accounts payable - related parties||-||25,823|
|NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES||438,558||444,453|
|CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES|
|Proceeds from sales of property and equipment||172,000||23,586|
|Purchases of property, plant and equipment||(6,094||)||(4,000||)|
|NET CASH PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES||165,906||19,586|
|CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES|
|Proceeds from bank lines of credit||6,519,236||6,815,000|
|Repayment of bank lines of credit||(7,097,881||)||(7,319,231||)|
|Repayment of bank loans||(80,579||)||(74,380||)|
|Proceeds from sale of common stock||-||50,000|
|Payment of issuance costs related to sale of common stock||-||(2,000||)|
|Repayment of loan to third party||(16,069||)||(6,819||)|
|Proceeds from advances from related parties||115,000||-|
|NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES||(560,293||)||(537,430||)|
|NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND RESTRICTED CASH||44,171||(73,391||)|
|CASH AND RESTRICTED CASH, beginning of year||189,128||262,519|
|CASH AND RESTRICTED CASH, end of year||$||233,299||$||189,128|
|SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION|
|Cash paid during the period for interest|
|SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:|
|Reclassification of accrued salary to notes payable - long-term||$||17,425||$||51,239|
|Accrued director fees settled with common stock||$||19,000||$||-|
|The following table provides a reconciliation of cash and restricted cash reported within the consolidated balance sheet that sum to the total of the same such amounts shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows:|
|Total cash and restricted cash||$||233,299||$||189,128|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
PEN INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016
NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
PEN Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our”, “PEN” or the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, develops and sells a portfolio of nano-layer coatings, nano-based cleaners, and nano-composite products based on its proprietary technology, and performs nanotechnology product research and development generating revenues through performing contract services.
Through the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, PEN Brands LLC, formerly known as Nanofilm, Ltd., we develop, manufacture and sell consumer and institutional products using nanotechnology to deliver unique performance attributes at the surfaces of a wide variety of substrates. These products are marketed internationally primarily to customers in the optical industry. On May 2, 2017, Nanofilm, Ltd. changed its name to PEN Brands LLC.
Through the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Applied Nanotech, Inc., we primarily perform design and development services for the Company and for governmental and private customers.
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Applied Nanotech, Inc., PEN Technology LLC, and PEN Brands LLC. On December 15, 2016, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, PEN Technology LLC, was merged into PEN Brands LLC. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As reflected in the consolidated financial statements, the Company had a net loss and net cash provided by operations of $687,068 and $438,558, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2017. Furthermore, the Company had an accumulated deficit, a stockholders’ deficit and a working capital deficit of $6,587,235, $1,096,005 and $1,345,095, respectively, at December 31, 2017. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that these consolidated financial statements are issued. Management cannot provide assurance that the Company will ultimately achieve profitable operations, become cash flow positive or raise additional capital. During 2016 and 2017, management has taken measures to reduce operating expenses. Although the Company has historically raised debt capital there is no assurance that it will be able to continue to do so. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital or secure additional lending in the near future, management expects that the Company will need to curtail its operations. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 include estimates for allowance for doubtful accounts on accounts receivable, the estimates for obsolete inventory, the estimates for cooperative advertising liability, the useful life of property and equipment, assumptions used in assessing impairment of long-term assets, estimates of current and deferred income taxes and deferred tax valuation allowances, the fair value of non-cash equity transactions, and the fair value of equity incentives.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 for fair value measurements which clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes methods for measuring fair value, and establishes a fair value hierarchy to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities available at the measurement date.
Level 2 - Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 - Inputs are unobservable inputs which reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions on what assumptions the market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best available information.
The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, loans and lines of credit, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other payables approximate their fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.
The Company analyzes all financial and non-financial instruments with features of both liabilities and equity under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) accounting standard for such instruments. Under this standard, financial and non-financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company accounts for three instruments at fair value using level 3 valuation.
|At December 31, 2017||At December 31, 2016|
|Description||Level 1||Level 2||Level 3||Level 1||Level 2||Level 3|
|Stock appreciation rights Plan A||-||-||$||-||-||-||$||53,108|
|Equity credits issued||-||-||$||2,278||-||-||$||2,278|
A rollforward of the level 3 valuation of these three financial instruments is as follows:
|Stock Appreciation Rights Plan A||Equity Credits Issued|
|Balance at December 31, 2015||$||53,108||$||14,154|
|Change in fair value included in net loss||-||(11,876||)|
|Balance at December 31, 2016||53,108||2,278|
|Change in fair value included in net loss||1,430||-|
|Reclassification to cash liability||(54,538||)||-|
|Balance at December 31, 2017||$||-||$||2,278|
ASC 825-10 “Financial Instruments”, allows entities to voluntarily choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value (fair value option). The fair value option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable, unless a new election date occurs. If the fair value option is elected for an instrument, unrealized gains and losses for that instrument should be reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The Company did not elect to apply the fair value option to any outstanding instruments.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the purchase date and money market accounts to be cash equivalents. Restricted cash includes $10,003 which is restricted in its use as it serves as collateral for a credit card and $85,000 held in a collateral bank account by a lender (see Note 6).
The Company recognizes an allowance for losses on accounts receivable in an amount equal to the estimated probable losses net of recoveries. The allowance is based on an analysis of historical bad debt experience, current receivables aging, and expected future write-offs, as well as an assessment of specific identifiable customer accounts considered at risk or uncollectible. The expense associated with the allowance for doubtful accounts is recognized as general and administrative expense.
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
Effective January 1, 2017, the Company adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory,” (“ASU 2015-11”) which requires an entity to measure most inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value, thereby simplifying the current guidance under which an entity must measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which range from three to ten years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the useful life or lease term including scheduled renewal terms. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When assets are retired or disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gains or losses are included in other income or expense in the year of disposition. The Company examines the possibility of decreases in the value of these assets when events or changes in circumstances reflect the fact that their recorded value may not be recoverable.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
In accordance with ASC Topic 360, the Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable, or at least annually. The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. The amount of impairment is measured as the difference between the asset’s estimated fair value and its book value. The Company did not record any impairment charge for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Pursuant to the guidance of ASC Topic 605, the Company recognizes sales when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been provided, the purchase price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.
Types of revenue:
|●||Net product sales by our subsidiary PEN Brands LLC.|
|●||Reimbursements under agreements to perform contract services related to new products and product development for government agencies and others by our subsidiary, Applied Nanotech. We do not perform contracts that are contingent upon successful results. Larger projects are sometimes broken down in phases to allow the customer to determine at the end of each phase if they wish to move to the next phase. The agreements with federal government agencies generally provide that, upon completion of a technology development program, the funding agency is granted a royalty-free license to use any technology developed during the course of the program for its own purposes, but not any preexisting technology that we use in connection with the program. We retain all other rights to use, develop, and commercialize the technology. Agreements with nongovernmental entities generally allow the entity the first opportunity to license the technology from us upon completion of the project.|
|●||Product sales and other miscellaneous revenues from our subsidiary, Applied Nanotech such as the sale of conductive inks, graphene foils and thermal management materials.|
Revenue recognition criteria:
|●||Net product sales by our subsidiary PEN Brands LLC, are recognized when the product is shipped to the customer and title is transferred.|
|●||Revenue from contract services performed under government contracts is recognized when it is earned pursuant to the terms of the contract. These projects are usually billed monthly based on costs, hours, or some other measure of activity during the month and revenue is recognized as services are provided. If there are substantive acceptance terms, then revenue will not be recognized until acceptance occurs. The recognition of revenue may not correspond with the billings allowable under the contract. To the extent that billings exceed revenue earned, a portion of the revenue is deferred until it is earned.|
|●||Revenue from contract services performed under non-governmental contracts is recognized when it is earned pursuant to the terms of the contract. Each contract is unique and tailored to the needs of the customer and goals of the project. Some contracts may call for a monthly payment for a fixed period of time. Other contracts may be for a fixed dollar amount with an unspecified time period, although there is frequently a targeted completion date. These contracts generally involve some sort of up-front payment. Some contracts may call for the delivery of samples or may call for the transfer of equipment or other items developed during the project to the customer. These projects are usually billed monthly based on costs, hours, or some other measure of activity during the month and revenue is recognized as services are provided. If there are substantive acceptance terms, then revenue will not be recognized until acceptance occurs.|
|●||Revenue from other product sales is recognized at the time the product shipped. The Company’s subsidiary Applied Nanotech’s primary business is contract services, not the sale of products. Product sales are generally insignificant in number and value and are generally limited to the sale of conductive inks, graphene foils, thermal management materials, samples, proofs of concepts, prototypes, or other items resulting from its contract services.|
|●||Other miscellaneous revenue is recognized as deemed appropriate given the facts of the situation and is generally not material.|
See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies “Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements” for details surrounding the Company’s adoption of Accounting Standards Codification 606 – Revenue Recognition.
Sales Incentives and Consideration Paid to Customers
The Company accounts for certain promotional costs such as sales incentives and cooperative advertising as a reduction of sales. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded approximately $108,303 and $139,711 respectively, as a reduction of sales related to these costs.
The Company has recently become aware of industry trends related to cooperative advertising, such that, during the year ended December 31, 2017, management now believes it has sufficient data and experience to effect a change in accounting estimate. As a result, the Company recorded a one-time adjustment to reduce its cooperative advertising liability by approximately $446,000 to $0 as of December 31, 2017 with a corresponding $446,000 increase to product revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales includes inventory costs, materials and supplies costs, internal labor and related benefits, subcontractor costs, depreciation, overhead and shipping and handling costs incurred.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs incurred relating to the purchase of inventory are included in inventory which is charged to cost of sales as product are sold. Shipping and handling costs incurred for product shipped to customers are included in cost of sales. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 shipping and handling costs amounted to $185,762 and $184,177, respectively.
Research and Development
Research and development costs incurred in the development of the Company’s products and under other Company sponsored research and development projects are expensed as incurred. Costs such as direct labor, direct costs, and other allocated costs incurred to perform research and development service pursuant to government and private research projects are in included in cost of sales. Research and development costs incurred in the development of the Company’s products for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $286,395 and $290,402, respectively, and are included in operating expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The Company participates in various advertising programs. All costs related to advertising of the Company’s products are expensed in the period incurred. Advertising costs charged to operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $14,626 and $31,523, respectively, and are included in selling and marketing on the consolidated accompanying statements of operations. These advertising expenses do not include cooperative advertising and sales incentives which have been deducted from sales.
Federal and State Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income tax using the liability method prescribed by ASC 740, “Income Taxes”. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates that will be in effect in the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation allowance to offset deferred tax assets if based on the weight of available evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or loss in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company follows the accounting guidance for uncertainty in income taxes using the provisions of ASC 740 “Income Taxes ”. Using that guidance, tax positions initially need to be recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had no uncertain tax positions that qualify for either recognition or disclosure in the financial statements. Tax years that remain subject to examination are the years ending on and after December 31, 2014. The Company does not expect any significant changes in its unrecognized tax benefits within twelve months of the reporting date. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax positions in other expense. However, no such interest and penalties were recorded as of December 31, 2017 or 2016.
See Note 10 – Income Taxes for additional details including the effects of the tax cuts and Jobs Act enacted in December 2017.
Stock-based compensation is accounted for based on the requirements of the Share-Based Payment Topic of ASC 718 which requires recognition in the financial statements of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee or director is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively, the vesting period). The ASC also requires measurement of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date fair value of the award.
Pursuant to ASC Topic 505-50, for share-based payments to consultants and other third-parties, compensation expense is determined at the “measurement date.” The expense is recognized over the service period of the award. Until the measurement date is reached, the total amount of compensation expense remains uncertain. The Company initially records compensation expense based on the fair value of the award at the reporting date.
Loss Per Share of Common Stock
ASC 260 “Earnings Per Share”, requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) with a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic EPS computation to the numerator and denominator of the diluted EPS computation. Basic EPS excludes dilution. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock, common stock equivalents and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during each period. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, 37,778 contingently issuable common shares that are issuable based on certain market conditions (see Note 9) are not included in the potential dilutive shares in calculating the diluted EPS. Additionally, potentially dilutive common shares consist of common stock options and warrants (using the treasury stock method).
These common stock equivalents may be dilutive in the future . Potentially dilutive common shares were excluded from the computation of diluted shares outstanding as they would have an anti-dilutive impact on the Company’s net losses and consisted of the following:
|December 31, 2017||December 31, 2016|
Additionally, there are an unknown quantity of common stock equivalents that result from a potential conversion of equity credits and stock appreciation rights (See Notes 13 and 14).
Net loss per share for each class of common stock is as follows:
|Net loss per common shares outstanding:||
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
|Class A common stock||$||(0.24||)||$||(0.19||)|
|Class B common stock||$||(0.22||)||$||(0.18||)|
|Class Z common stock||$||-||$||(0.18||)|
|Weighted average shares outstanding:|
|Class A common stock||1,539,810||1,351,432|
|Class B common stock||1,414,349||1,398,397|
|Class Z common stock||102,894||262,631|
|Total weighted average shares outstanding||3,057,052||3,012,460|
The Company uses “the management approach” in determining reportable operating segments. The management approach considers the internal organization and reporting used by the Company’s chief operating decision maker for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the source for determining the Company’s reportable segments. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chairman and chief executive officer (“CEO”) of the Company, who reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance for the entire Company. The Company classified the reportable operating segments into (i) the development, manufacture and sale of consumer and institutional products using nanotechnology to deliver unique performance attributes at the surfaces of a wide variety of substrates (the “Product segment”) and (ii) nanotechnology design and development services for our future products and for government and private entities and sales of products developed for third parties (the “Contract services segment”).
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605 - Revenue Recognition (“ASC 605”) and most industry-specific guidance throughout ASC 605. The FASB has issued numerous updates that provide clarification on a number of specific issues as well as requiring additional disclosures. The core principle of ASC 606 requires that an entity recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASC 606 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, it is possible more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than required under existing U.S. GAAP including identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. The guidance also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from an entity’s contracts with customers. The guidance may be adopted through either retrospective application to all periods presented in the financial statements (full retrospective approach) or through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings at the effective date (modified retrospective approach). The guidance was revised in July 2015 to be effective for public companies for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017.
The Company plans to adopt ASC 606 effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method. As of the date of filing, the Company has not completed its ASC 606 implementation process and, as a result, cannot disclose the quantitative impact of adoption on its financial statement. That being said, based on its preliminary analysis, the Company believes that revenue related to product sales, represented approximately 87% and 88% of its total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, will not be materially impacted as a result of adopting ASC 606. Revenues related to contract services represented approximately 13% and 12% of its total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and, while the Company does not currently believe these revenue streams will be materially impacted as a result of adopting ASC 606, it needs to complete the implementation process before it is able to conclude, including related to the timing of revenue recognition of these revenue streams.
On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 (“ASU 2016-02”) to amend the accounting guidance for leases. The accounting applied by a lessor is largely unchanged under ASU 2016-02. However, the standard requires lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for leases classified as operating leases on the balance sheet. Lessees will recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. If a lessee makes this election, it will recognize lease expense for such leases generally on a straight-line basis over the lease term. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the guidance on its consolidated financial statements and notes to its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09 (“ASU 2016-09”) to amend the accounting guidance for share-based payment accounting. The areas for simplification in ASU 2016-09 involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”), requiring restricted cash and cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company has elected to early adopt this new ASU and its adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting” (“ASU 2017-09”). ASU 2017-09 provides clarity on the accounting for modifications of stock-based awards. ASU 2017-09 requires adoption on a prospective basis in the annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 for share-based payment awards modified on or after the adoption date. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that adopting this new accounting guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-11, “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) - Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features,” (“ASU 2017-11”). Equity-linked instruments, such as warrants and convertible instruments may contain down round features that result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Under ASU 2017-11, a down round feature will no longer require a freestanding equity-linked instrument (or embedded conversion option) to be classified as a liability that is remeasured at fair value through the income statement (i.e. marked-to-market). However, other features of the equity-linked instrument (or embedded conversion option) must still be evaluated to determine whether liability or equity classification is appropriate. Equity classified instruments are not marked-to-market. For earnings per share (“EPS”) reporting, the ASU requires companies to recognize the effect of the down round feature only when it is triggered by treating it as a dividend and as a reduction of income available to common shareholders in basic EPS. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that adopting this new accounting guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.
There are no other recently issued accounting standards that apply to us or that are expected to have a material impact on our results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
Certain amounts included within current liabilities as of December 31, 2016 were reclassified to other line items within current liabilities to conform to the 2017 presentation. Total current liabilities at December 31, 2016 remains unchanged.
NOTE 3 – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, accounts receivable consisted of the following:
|December 31, 2017||December 31, 2016|
|Less: allowance for doubtful accounts||(15,605||)||(20,493||)|
|Accounts receivable, net||$||607,632||$||722,845|
Bad debt expense, net of recoveries, was $5,067 and $12,021 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
NOTE 4 – INVENTORY
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, inventory consisted of the following:
|December 31, 2017||December 31, 2016|
|Less: reserve for obsolescence||(249,828||)||(231,027||)|
Excess write-downs related to inventory obsolescence during the year ended December 31, 2017 were $147,600 and included within cost of sales on consolidated statement of operations.
NOTE 5 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, property and equipment consisted of the following:
|Useful Life||December 31, 2017||December 31, 2016|
|Machinery and equipment||5 - 10 Years||$||2,725,391||$||3,892,377|
|Furniture and office equipment||3 - 7 Years||578,731||1,032,132|
|Leasehold improvements||7 - 15 Years||10,843||287,162|
|Construction in progress||-||-||-|
|Less: accumulated depreciation||(2,926,188||)||(4,502,044||)|
|Property and equipment, net||$||388,777||$||709,627|
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, depreciation and amortization expense amounted to $121,267 and $182,987, respectively, of which $64,587 and $131,942, respectively, is included in cost of sales and the remainder is included in operating expenses.
During the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company sold excess equipment for proceeds of $172,000 and $23,586 respectively. The net book value of the equipment was $205,677 and $0, respectively, resulting in a (loss) gain of $(33,677) and $23,586 during the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
NOTE 6 – BANK LOANS AND LINES OF REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY
In April 2014, our subsidiary, PEN Brands LLC entered into a $1,500,000 revolving credit line agreement (the “Revolving Note”) with Mackinac Commercial Credit, LLC (the “Lender”) with draws limited to a borrowing base as defined in the Revolving Note. The unpaid principal balance of this Revolving Note is payable on demand, is secured by all of PEN Brands LLC’s assets, and bears interest computed at a rate of interest (the “Effective Rate”) which is equal to 7.0% above the LIBOR Rate, as defined, payable monthly. PEN Brands LLC will pay to Lender a late charge of 5.0% of any monthly payment not received by Lender within 10 calendar days after its due date. The Company may, at any time or from time to time upon three business days’ written notice to Lender, prepay the Note in whole provided that if (i) Borrower prepays the Revolving Note in full and terminates the Revolving Note, or (ii) Lender terminates the Revolving Note after default, then Borrower will pay a termination premium equal to 2.0% of the maximum loan amount. On May 1, 2015, PEN Brands LLC and the Lender entered into an amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement extending the outside maturity date to April 4, 2016 and permitting advances against an expanded borrowing base. The borrowing base was increased by $450,000 through October 31, 2015, with this amount reducing by $7,500 monthly thereafter. In addition, PEN Inc., the parent company, guaranteed PEN Brands LLC’s obligations to the Lender. On April 4, 2016, the maturity date under the Loan & Security Agreement between PEN Brands LLC and the Lender was automatically extended for a one-year renewal term.
Without the Lender’s consent, so long as the obligation remains outstanding, in addition to other covenants as defined in the Revolving Note, PEN Brands LLC shall not a) merge or consolidate with any other company, except for the combination that closed in August 2014 and shall not suffer a change of control; b) make any capital expenditures, as defined, materially affecting the business; c) declare or pay cash dividends upon any of its stock, or distribute any of its property, make any loans, make investments, redeem, retire or acquire any of its stock, d) become liable for the indebtedness of anyone else, as defined, and e) incur indebtedness, other than trade payables.
On April 3, 2017, PEN Brands LLC and the Lender executed a second amendment to the Revolving Note that extended the maturity date to April 4, 2018, with a one-year renewal option. The second amendment also changed the interest rate to 3.0% above the Prime Rate, as reported in the Wall Street Journal. Under a subsequent amendment (see Note 16), the maturity date was changed to July 3, 2018.
On October 17, 2017, pursuant to the terms of the third amendment to the Revolving Note, the borrowing base was decreased by $85,000 based on the sale of fixed assets under the Asset Purchase Agreement (See Note 5). Pursuant to this amendment, the Company established a cash collateral account of $85,000 to increase the borrowing base back up by $85,000. The funds for the cash collateral account were loaned to the Company by two directors (See Note 8).
At December 31, 2017 and 2016 the Company had a line of credit balance outstanding of $563,218 and $979,688, respectively, which includes accrued interest of $14,797 and $17,494, respectively. Advances are less than the amount of the credit line and are limited by the borrowing base at the time of the request for the advance. The amount available on the line of credit was $78,850 at December 31, 2017. The weighted average interest rate during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was approximately 5.5% and 8.0%, respectively.
NOTE 7 – NOTES PAYABLE
On February 10, 2015, Nanofilm entered into a promissory note (the “Equipment Note”) with KeyBank, N.A. (the “Bank”) to borrow up to $373,000. Nanofilm may obtain one or more advances not to exceed $373,000. The unpaid principal balance of this Equipment Note is payable in 60 equal monthly installments payments of principal and interest through June 10, 2020. The Equipment Note is secured by certain equipment, as defined in the Equipment Note, and bears interest computed at a rate of interest of 4.35% per annum based on a year of 360 days. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the principal amount due under the Equipment Note amounted to $179,399, and $260,331, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, $74,380 and $105,019, respectively, represent the current and non-current portion due under this note.
In June and November 2015, in connection with a severance package offered to four employees, the Company entered into four promissory note agreements with the four employees which obligate the Company to pay these employees accrued and unpaid deferred salary in an aggregate amount of $51,808. The principal amounts due under these notes shall bear interest at the minimum rate of interest applicable under the internal revenue code (approximately 3.0% at December 31, 2017). All principal and interest payable under three of these notes aggregating $37,458 are due in 2025 and all principal and interest payable under one of these notes amounting to $14,350 are due in 2020. Accordingly, $51,808 is included in non-current notes payable.
On May 31, 2016, in connection with a restatement of our agreement with a former research partner, we delivered a promissory note to repay amounts previously advanced to us and accrued. The initial principal amount was $51,239 bearing interest at 5% per annum. Installment payments include both principal and interest. After an initial payment of $2,000, the note requires payments of $1,000 for eleven months, payments of $2,000 for the following 12 months and monthly payments of $3,000 thereafter until paid in full. The principal balance due on December 31, 2016 was $44,420, with $16,068 reflected as the current portion At December 31, 2017 the principal balance due was $28,351 all classified as a current liability. Under the above restatement certain patent costs that we had accrued for payment will, instead, be an offset against future royalties that may become due to us, so we reversed accruals of $33,713, resulting in a net gain of $33,511 in 2016, which is included within other income, net on the consolidated statement of operations.
January 2017, the Company issued a promissory note in the principal amount of $17,425 to a departing employee representing the amount of his accrued and unpaid salary. The note does not bear interest and is due in January 2027, and is included in non-current notes payable.
Future principal payments of notes payable are as follows:
|Years ending December 31:||Amount|
NOTE 8 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Sales to Related Party
During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company engaged in certain sales transactions with a company which is a shareholder and related to a director of the Company. Sales to the related party totaled $168,255 and $177,747 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively Accounts receivable from the related party totaled $14,226 at December 31, 2017 and $10,474 at December 31, 2016. As of May 23, 2017, that director no longer served on the Company’s Board and the shareholder was no longer an affiliate.
A board member is a principal in DHJH Holdings LLC, the firm that provided the services of the Company’s chief financial officer from May 2016 through February 2017. The Company recognized $10,857 and $55,208 in fees and expenses during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company included $1,000 of director fees within accounts payable-related parties.
Additionally, advances from related parties of $115,000 from certain Company directors and executives have been included within the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017. These loans are non-interest bearing and are due on demand.
NOTE 9 - STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Description of Preferred and Common Stock
On December 11, 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a reverse stock split of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock at the ratio of 1-for-180 (the “Reverse Stock Split”) and authorized an amendment of the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, to effect the Reverse Stock Split, to reduce the number of authorized shares of common stock, and to set a par value of $0.0001 per share after the Reverse Stock Split. On January 26, 2016, each one hundred eighty (180) shares of the Company’s (i) Class A Common Stock (“Class A common stock”), (iii) Class B Common Stock and (iii) Class Z Common Stock, then issued and outstanding were automatically combined into one (1) validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable share of Class A Common Stock, Class B Common Stock and Class Z Common Stock, respectively, without any further action by the Company or the holder. Additionally, the authorized number of shares of common stock were reduced to 10,000,000 comprised of 7,200,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, 2,500,000 shares of Class B Common Stock (“Class B common stock”), and 300,000 shares of Class Z Common Stock (“Class Z common stock”). The par value of each class of common stock remained the same at $0.0001 per common share. All share and per share data in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been retroactively restated to reflect the effect of the Reverse Stock Split and authorized shares. The Company is also authorized to issue 20,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“preferred stock”).
The preferred stock may be issued in one or more series. The Company’s board of directors are authorized to issue the shares of preferred stock in such series and to fix from time to time before issuance thereof the number of shares to be included in any such series and the designation, powers, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other rights, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, of such series.
Common Stock – General
The rights of each share of Class A common stock, each share of Class B common stock and each share of Class Z common stock are the same with respect to dividends, distributions and rights upon liquidation.
Class A Common Stock
Holders of the Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share in the election of directors and other matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders.
Class B Common Stock
Conversion Rights . Shares of Class B common stock can be converted, one-for-one, into shares of Class A common stock at any time at the option of the holder. Shares of Class B common stock will automatically be converted into shares of Class A common stock if the shares of Class B common stock are not owned by the Company’s chief executive officer, his spouse, or their descendants and their spouses, or by entities or trusts wholly-owned by them.
Voting Rights Holders of PEN Class B common stock are entitled to 100 votes per share in the election of directors and other matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders.
Class Z Common Stock
Conversion Rights . Shares of Class Z common stock can be converted, one-for-one, into shares of Class A common stock at any time at the option of the holder. Shares of Class Z common stock will automatically be converted into shares of Class A common stock if the shares of Class Z common stock are not owned by Zeiss or an entity wholly owned by the ultimate parent of Zeiss.
Voting Rights . Holders of PEN Class Z common stock do not vote in the election of directors or otherwise, but they do have the right to designate a director to the PEN Board, have anti-dilution rights described below and have consent rights with respect to certain amendments to PEN’s certificate of incorporation.
Other Rights . The Class Z common stock has anti-dilutive rights that, subject to limited exceptions, permit holders of Class Z common stock to purchase additional shares or equity rights issued by PEN (on the same terms as made available to third parties by PEN) to maintain their economic ownership percentage. The holders of Class Z common stock are also entitled to receive a copy of any notice sent to the holders of Class A common stock or Class B common stock, as and when the notice is sent to such holders.
Issuances of Common Stock
Common Stock Issued for Services
On February 17, 2016, the Company issued 1,248 shares of Class A common stock and 624 shares of Class B common stock to the Company’s directors in partial payment for their service on the Company’s board. These shares were valued on the date of grant of February 17, 2016 at $3.20 per share based on the quoted price of the stock for a total value of $6,000.
On April 25, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,800 shares of Class A common stock and 1,600 shares of Class B common stock to the Company’s directors as compensation for their service on the Company’s board and Board committees. These shares were valued on the date of grant of April 25, 2016 at $2.50 per share based on the quoted price of the stock for a total value of $11,000.
On July 25, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,667 shares of our Class A common stock and 1,778 shares of our Class B common stock as compensation to our directors for service on our board. These shares were valued on the date of grant of July 25, 2015 at $2.25 per share based on the closing price of our stock for a total value of $10,000.
On November 14, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 3,636 shares of Class A common stock and 2,424 shares of Class B common stock to the Company’s directors as compensation to them for service on our board. These shares were valued on the date of grant of November 14, 2016 at $1.65 per share based on the quoted price of the stock for a total value of $10,000.
On February 24, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 3,846 shares of Class A common stock and 2,564 shares of Class B common stock to the Company’s directors as payment for their service on the Company’s board. These shares were valued on the date of grant at $1.56 per share based on the quoted price of the stock for a total value of $10,000 recognized as stock-based compensation expense.
On April 28, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 10,000 shares of Class A common stock and 12,308 shares of Class B common stock to the Company’s directors as payment for their service on the Company’s board. The shares issued included 4,617 Class A and 3,078 Class B shares as compensation for attendance at the meeting on that date and the rest were issued in payment of $19,000 in accrued director fees from a prior year. These shares are valued were valued on the date of grant of April 28, 2017 at $1.30 per share based on the quoted price of the stock for a total value of $29,000 with $10,000 recognized as stock-based compensation expense.
On July 28, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,800 shares of Class A common stock and 3,200 shares of Class B common stock to the Company’s directors as payment for their service on the Company’s board. These shares were valued on the date of grant at $1.25 per share based on the quoted closing price of the stock for a total value of $10,000 recognized as stock-based compensation expense.
On November 17, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,614 shares of Class A common stock and 3,076 shares of Class B common stock to the Company’s directors as compensation to them for service on our board. These shares were valued on that date at $1.30 per share based on the quoted price of the stock for a total value of $9,999 recognized as stock-based compensation expense.
Sales of Common Stock
On July 25, 2016, the Company issued 17,793 shares of Class A common stock at a price of $2.81 per share to a private investor for a total cash purchase of $50,000 that was received in May 2016 and reflected as a deposit on stock purchase liability at June 30, 2016. On July 25, 2016, we also issued a 5-year warrant to purchase up to 712 shares of Class A common stock at an exercise price of $2.81 per share to the investment banking firm that assisted us in placing the shares with that investor for a value of $1,546, assuming a 1.15% risk free rate and 191.8% annual volatility. The Company also paid that firm a cash fee of $2,000. Both the warrant value and cash fee were charged against the proceeds to additional paid in capital.
On July 25, 2016, the Company granted to two consultants five-year options to purchase an aggregate of 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $2.81 per share. The options vest and become exercisable after the Company has recorded revenue of at least $1,000,000 for its HALO brand products that reflect the rebranding designed with the assistance of the consultants. Pursuant to ASC 505, the fair value of the options is measured once the performance condition is achieved, at which time the Company will recognize expense associated with the options.
No options were granted in 2017. Stock options outstanding are to purchase Class A common stock. Stock option activities for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are summarized as follows:
|Number of Options||
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual
|Balance Outstanding, December 31, 2015||12,397||$||81.15|
|Balance Outstanding, December 31, 2016||20,483||$||41.77|
|Balance Outstanding, December 31, 2017||19,120||$||29.38||3.21||$||-|
|Exercisable, December 31, 2017||9,120||$||58.52||2.82||-|
As of December 31, 2017, there were outstanding and exercisable warrants to purchase an aggregate of 712 shares of common stock with a weighted average exercise price of $2.81 per share and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 3.57 years. As of December 31, 2017, there was no intrinsic value for the warrants.
Contingently Issuable Class A Common Shares
On August 27, 2014, the Company entered into a Restricted Stock Agreement with Dr. Zvi Yaniv, the former Chief Operating Officer and President, of Applied Nanotech, and a current employee of the Company granting Dr. Yaniv 37,778 shares of Class A common stock, subject to forfeiture. All these shares become vested and not subject to forfeiture on the earlier of a change of control of the Company, Dr. Yaniv’s death, or if more than 180 days after closing, the average trading price of the shares during a measurement period of ten consecutive trading days reaches certain price thresholds. At an $18.00 price, 5,554 shares vest, with additional tranches of 5,556 shares vesting if the price reaches $27.00, $36.00, $45.00 and $54.00. The last 10,000 shares vest at a $63.00 price threshold.
Any shares that have not vested five years after the effective date will be forfeited. The Company also entered into a Piggyback Registration Rights Agreement that will allow Dr. Yaniv, subject to other customary terms and conditions, to register shares that are no longer subject to forfeiture if the Company is registering its shares. Pursuant to ASC 718-10 and related subsections, these shares were valued on the date of grant of August 27, 2014 at $13.12 per share for a total value of $495,720. The Company estimates the fair value of the awards with market conditions using a Binomial simulation, which utilizes several assumptions including the risk-free interest rate, the volatility of the Company’s stock and the exercise behavior of award recipients. The grant-date fair value of $495,720 of the awards will be recognized over the requisite service period of 3 years, which represents the derived service period for the stock grant as determined by the Binomial simulation method. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, in connection with the amortization of the fair value of this stock grant, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $110,160 and $165,240 respectively, At December 31, 2017, there is no unamortized stock-based compensation expense to be recognized in future periods.
Conversion of Class Z Common Stock
On May 23, 2017, Zeiss converted 262,631 shares of Class Z common stock into 262,631 shares of Class A common stock. Immediately thereafter, Zeiss sold 262,631 shares of Class A common stock to certain buyers which included the Company’s Chief Executive Officer for an aggregate of $100,000. In addition, pursuant to the certificate of incorporation, Zeiss’ Board representation automatically terminated and, as a result, Zeiss ceased to be a related party as of May 23, 2017.
2015 Equity Incentive Plan
On November 30, 2015, the Board of Directors authorized the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which reserved 111,111 shares of common stock. If any share of common stock that has been granted pursuant to a stock option ceases to be subject to a stock option, or if any forfeiture or termination affects shares of common stock that are the subject to any other stock-based award, the shares are again available for future grants and awards under the Plan. The Plan’s purpose is to enable the Company to offer its employees, officers, directors and consultants an opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company for their contributions. As of December 31, 2017, 17,284 Class A common shares and options to purchase up to 10,000 Class A common shares have been issued under the Plan and 83,827 shares are available for future issuance.
NOTE 10 – INCOME TAXES
The Company maintains deferred tax assets and liabilities that reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The net deferred tax asset has been fully offset by a valuation allowance because of the uncertainty of the attainment of future taxable income.
The items accounting for the difference between income taxes at the effective statutory rate and the provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
|Years Ended December 31,|
|Income tax benefit at U.S. statutory rate of 34%||$||(234,000||)||$||(189,000|
|Forfeiture of stock options||-||21,000|
|Change in valuation allowance||(1,159,000||)||88,000|
|Revaluation of deferred tax assets under U.S. tax act||1,388,000||-|
|Total provision for income tax||$||-||$||-|
The Company’s approximate net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
|December 31, 2017||December 31, 2016|
|Deferred Tax Assets:|
|Net operating loss carryforward||$||1,988,000||$||3,002,000|
|Allowance for inventory obsolescence||56,000||79,000|
|Total deferred tax assets||2,245,000||3,404,000|
|Net deferred tax assets||$||-||$|
The estimated net operating loss carryforward was approximately $9,464,000 at December 31, 2017, which is an estimate of the Company’s net operating loss carryforward acquired in the Combination after giving effect to the limitation on the usage of such net operating loss carryforwards due to a change in ownership in accordance with Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code plus net operating loss carryforwards since the Combination. The Company provided a valuation allowance equal to the net deferred income tax asset for the year ended December 31, 2017 because it was not known whether future taxable income will be sufficient to utilize the loss carryforward. The potential tax benefit arising from tax loss carryforwards will expire between 2019 and 2037.
On December 22, 2017, H.R. 1, known as the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (the Act), was signed into law. The Act includes a number of changes in existing tax law impacting businesses including, among other things, a permanent change in the corporate income tax rate to a fixed rate of 21%. The new rate took effect on January 1, 2018. As a result, the Company revalued its deferred taxes at December 31, 2017.
In accordance with Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, the usage of the Company’s net operating loss carry forwards are subject to annual limitations due to greater than 50% ownership changes. Additionally, the future utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards to offset future taxable income may be subject to special tax rules which may limit their usage under the Separate Return Limitation Year (“SRLY”) rules. If necessary, the deferred tax assets will be reduced by any carryforward that expires prior to utilization as a result of such limitations, with a corresponding reduction of the valuation allowance.
The Company’s 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 Corporate Income Tax Returns are subject to Internal Revenue Service examination.
NOTE 11 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINCENGIES
The Company leases its facilities and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. The Company has the right to renew certain facility leases for an additional five years. Rent expense for operating leases was $529,723 and $634,853 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, including $5,346 of amortization for deferred lease incentives for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
On September 20, 2017, the Company entered into a three-year lease agreement for 22,172 square feet of office space in Brooklyn Heights, Ohio beginning September 20, 2017 and ending September 20, 2020. Monthly lease payments amount to $8,688 for a total of approximately $312,768 for the total term of the lease.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases at December 31, 2017 are as follows:
|Years ending December 31,||Amount|
|Total minimum non-cancelable operating lease payments||$||572,973|
Equity credits may become convertible into an unknown amount of capital stock of the Company to be determined by the Company’s board of directors (See Note 13).
The Company may be, from time to time, subject to various administrative, regulatory, and other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently a defendant in any proceedings. Our policy is to accrue costs for contingent liabilities, including legal proceedings or unasserted claims that may result in legal proceedings, when a liability is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has not accrued any amount for litigation contingencies, except for $85,000 relating to a settlement which occurred in May 2018 (See Note 16).
NOTE 12 – CONCENTRATIONS
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of trade accounts receivable and cash deposits and investments in cash equivalent instruments.
The Company relies primarily on one lender under a $1,500,000 Revolving Note (See Note 6).
Customer concentrations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
|For the Years Ended December 31,|
|As of December 31,|
*Less than 10%
A reduction in sales from or loss of such customers would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
Geographic Concentrations of Sales
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, total sales in the United States represent approximately 74% and 90% of total consolidated revenues, respectively. No other geographical area accounting for more than 10% of total sales during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Vendor concentrations for inventory purchases for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are:
|For the Years Ended December 31,|
*Less than 10%
NOTE 13 – EQUITY CREDITS
In 1997, PEN Brands LLC established The Equity Credit Incentive Program. This program enabled select employees the opportunity to purchase equity credits that increase in value based upon an increase in PEN Brands LLC’s revenue over a base year of 1996. Eligible credits can be redeemed after two years at the equity credit value for that year. Under certain circumstances, the equity credits are convertible into PEN Brands LLC equity on a one-for-one basis. During the year ended December 31, 2016, no equity credits were forfeited and 38,500 units were redeemed for a cash payment made to the employees of $11,876. During the year ended December 31, 2017, no equity credits were forfeited and no units were redeemed. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, 8,250 equity credits were issued and outstanding with an aggregate redemption value of $2,278, all of which were held by the Company’s CEO. See Note 16 for details associated with the redemption of equity credits. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, $2,278 was accrued, and included in accrued expenses, representing the redemption value associated with the equity credits outstanding.
Under the terms of the Plan, when the Company completes a registered offering of its common stock, the equity credit participants will have the option to convert the equity credits into Class A common shares of the Company, or in the case of our President, into shares of Class B common stock.
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, there was no gain (loss) from the change in value of the equity credits.
NOTE 14 – STOCK APPRECIATION PLAN
From June 1, 1988, until December 31, 1997, when the plan was terminated, PEN Brands LLC had in place a Stock Appreciation Rights Plan A (the “Plan”), intended to provide employees, directors, members of a technical advisory board and certain independent contractors selected by the Board with equity-like participation in the growth of PEN Brands LLC. The maximum number of stock appreciation rights that could be granted by the Board was 1,000,000. There were 235,782 fully vested stock appreciation rights (“SARS”) outstanding under the terms of the Plan at December 31, 2017 and 2016.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company accrued $54,538 and $53,108, respectively, related to the cash redemption value associated with the stock appreciation rights held by terminated employees.
NOTE 15 – SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company’s principal operating segments coincide with the types of products to be sold. The products from which revenues are derived are consistent with the reporting structure of the Company’s internal organization. The Company’s two reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were the Product segment and ii) the Contract services segment (formerly the research and development segment). The Company’s chief operating decision-maker has been identified as the Chairman and CEO, who reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance for the entire Company. Segment information is presented based upon the Company’s management organization structure as of December 31, 2017 and the distinctive nature of each segment. Future changes to this internal financial structure may result in changes to the reportable segments disclosed. There are no inter-segment revenue transactions and, therefore, revenues are only to external customers. As the Company primarily generates its revenues from customers in the United States, no geographical segments are presented.
Segment operating profit is determined based upon internal performance measures used by the chief operating decision-maker. The Company derives the segment results from its internal management reporting system. The accounting policies the Company uses to derive reportable segment results are the same as those used for external reporting purposes. Management measures the performance of each reportable segment based upon several metrics, including net revenues, gross profit and operating loss. Management uses these results to evaluate the performance of, and to assign resources to, each of the reportable segments. The Company manages certain operating expenses separately at the corporate level and does not allocate such expenses to the segments. Segment income from operations excludes interest income/expense and other income or expenses and income taxes according to how a particular reportable segment’s management is measured. Management does not consider impairment charges, and unallocated costs in measuring the performance of the reportable segments.
Segment information available with respect to these reportable business segments for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:
|For the Years Ended|
|Contract services segment||1,005,647||1,003,710|
|Total segment and consolidated revenues||$||7,878,099||$||8,115,657|
|Contract services segment||(91,098||)||(94,181||)|
|Total segment and consolidated gross profit||$||2,268,036||$||2,805,687|
|Income (loss) from operations:|
|Contract services segment||(303,649||)||(334,916||)|
|Total segment income||87,975||270,867|
|Total consolidated loss from operations||$||(719,877||)||$||(747,020||)|
|Depreciation and amortization:|
|Contract services segment||12,380||39,365|
|Total segment depreciation and amortization||121,267||182,987|
|Total consolidated depreciation and amortization||$||121,267||$||182,987|
|Contract services segment||-||-|
|Total segment capital additions||6,094||4,000|
|Unallocated capital additions||-||-|
|Total consolidated capital additions||$||6,094||$||4,000|
|December 31, 2017||December 31, 2016|
|Segment total assets:|
|Contract services segment||168,740||146,193|
|Total consolidated total assets||$||2,181,275||$||2,793,731|
NOTE 16 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Issuances of Common Stock
On February 28, 2018, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,443 shares of Class A common stock and 2,962 shares of Class B common stock to the Company’s directors as compensation to them for service on its board. These shares were valued on that date at $1.35 per share based on the quoted price of the stock for a total value of $10,000. On that same day, the Company issued 6,476 shares of Class B common stock in satisfaction of the outstanding equity credits. As a result, the Company will record a loss on settlement of $6,464 during the three months ended March 31, 2018.
On May 23, 2018, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,043 shares of Class A common stock and 3,362 shares of Class B common stock to the Company’s directors as compensation to them for service on our board. These shares were valued on that date at $1.19 per share based on the quoted price of the stock for a total value of $10,000.
On May 4, 2018, the Company reached a settlement with a former employee in exchange for a full release. As a result, The Company has accrued $80,000 related to this settlement as of December 31, 2017.
Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement
On March 30, 2018, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary PEN Brands LLC. entered into the fourth amendment to its Loan and Security Agreement with the Lender (See Note 6). The amendment permits the borrower to request up to three advances of not more than $200,000 each supported by certain qualifying purchase orders. Each purchase order advance to be repaid in not less than 30 days. No subsequent request can be made until any prior purchase order advance has been repaid. Two of the Company’s officers and directors have personally guaranteed repayment of purchase order advances. The fourth amendment also changes the maturity date for the loan to July 3, 2018. That date becomes the date for an automatic one-year renewal unless either the lender or the borrower gives notice of non-renewal. Other terms and conditions of the agreement remain the same.
Item 9. Changes and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports, filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. In addition, the design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
As required by the SEC Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b), we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to the material weaknesses described below.
To address these material weaknesses, management engaged financial consultants, performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”) for the Company. Our internal control system was designed to, in general, provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and board regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements, but because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. The framework used by management in making that assessment was the criteria set forth in the document entitled “2013 Internal Control – Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that assessment, management concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2017 and that material weaknesses in ICFR existed as more fully described below.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, within the meaning of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) Auditing Standard AS 2201, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management has identified the following material weaknesses which have caused management to conclude that as of December 31, 2017 our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective at the reasonable assurance level:
|1.||We do not have sufficient resources in our accounting function, which restricts the Company’s ability to gather, analyze and properly review information related to financial reporting in a timely manner. In addition, due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated our limited resources and our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.|
|2.||We do not have personnel with sufficient experience with United States generally accepted accounting principles to address complex transactions.|
|3.||We have inadequate controls to ensure that information necessary to properly record transactions is adequately communicated on a timely basis from non-financial personnel to those responsible for financial reporting. Management evaluated the impact of the lack of timely communication between non–financial personnel and financial personnel on our assessment of our reporting controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency represented a material weakness.|
We have taken steps to remediate some of the weaknesses described above, including by engaging more experienced accounting personnel and a financial reporting advisor with expertise in accounting for complex transactions. We intend to continue to address these weaknesses as resources permit.
Notwithstanding the assessment that our ICFR was not effective and that there are material weaknesses as identified herein, we believe that our consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report fairly present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the years covered thereby in all material respects.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm as we are a smaller reporting company and are not required to provide the report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our internal control over financial reporting has not changed during the fourth quarter covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, except as discussed above.
Item 9B. Other Information.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The following sets forth the names of our directors and executive officers, their ages, positions they hold and the time they have served us. The narrative below sets out their principal occupations at present and for at least the past five years.
|Ronald J. Berman||61||Director||May 1996|
|Douglas Q. Holmes||62||Director||August 2014|
|Jeanne M. Rickert||65||Director and Chief Legal Officer||August 2014|
|Scott E. Rickert||64||Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer||August 2014|
|Jaqueline M. Soptick||50||Chief Accounting Officer||February 2017|
|Howard Westerman||65||Director||May 2007|
Our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. All directors listed above will remain in office until the next annual meeting of our stockholders, and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. There are no agreements with respect to the election of Directors. Our Board of Directors appoints officers annually and each Executive Officer serves at the discretion of our Board of Directors.
Ronald J. Berman was in the private practice of law from 1980-1987. Mr. Berman co-founded Rock Financial (now Quicken Loans) in 1985 and was a member of its Board of Directors. Mr. Berman cofounded BEG Enterprises and served as its President from 1989 to 1998. Mr. Berman is currently President of R.J. Berman Enterprises, Ltd., a real estate investment company, and practicing law as a sole practitioner. Mr. Berman is a licensed attorney in both Michigan and Florida. Mr. Berman filed for personal bankruptcy in 2011.
With his experience in legal matters and founding businesses, Mr. Berman provides our board with professional and strategic expertise as well as the benefit of his significant knowledge of business operations.
Douglas Q. Holmes is an investment banker and member of Holmes Hollister & Co. and a principal in DHJH Holdings LLC. Mr. Holmes has been an investment banker since 1978. He has been an investment banker in New York and Chicago for Lazard Freres & Co., The First Boston Corporation and Kidder, Peabody & Co. before starting two private investment banks, Carleton McCreary Holmes & Co., which was merged with Key Corp., and subsequently, Holmes Hollister & Co. Mr. Holmes has been a founding partner of a private equity firm, Full Circle Investments, and a mezzanine fund, Key Mezzanine Partners, and has been a principal and board member in several companies as a financial investor. Mr. Holmes has a wide range of merger and acquisition experience, advising both domestic and international corporations on both buying and selling companies, structuring joint ventures, providing fairness opinions and starting new businesses. His corporate finance experience includes public equity and debt offerings, structuring new asset based securities with complex tax structures and privately placing all forms of capital. Industry experience includes automotive/truck, specialty materials, consumer, healthcare, and natural resources. Mr. Holmes received a B.A. from Kenyon College and an M.B.A. from Tuck at Dartmouth College.
With his experience in corporate finance and mergers and acquisitions, Mr. Holmes brings broad corporate finance experience, knowledge of financing options and alternatives as well as providing significant knowledge of a wide range of mergers and acquisitions.
Jeanne M. Rickert has served as our General Counsel and a Director since August 2014 and as the General Counsel of Nanofilm since January, 2014. Before that she was a lawyer with the Cleveland office of the international law firm of Jones Day, as a partner of the firm for 25 years and as Of Counsel in 2013. Her practice focused on mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures and general corporate and commercial matters. Her undergraduate degree is from Cornell University and her law degree from Case Western Reserve University. She is married to Scott Rickert.
With her prior experience in the practice of law and as our General Counsel, Ms. Rickert provides our board with legal expertise as well as the benefit of her significant knowledge of business law and transactions.
Scott E. Rickert has served as Chairman of our Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President since August 2014. He had been the Chief Executive Officer of Nanofilm since 2002, after serving Nanofilm as President from its founding in 1985. Prior to starting Nanofilm, Mr. Rickert was a tenured professor of Macromolecular Science at Case Western Reserve University. He has a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Cornell University and an M.S. and Ph.D. from Case Western Reserve University. He did post-doctoral work at the University of Pennsylvania. He is married to Jeanne Rickert.
Combining his technical background and expertise with his prior experience in developing, commercializing and marketing enhanced-performance products enabled by nanotechnology, Mr. Rickert provides our board with technical and operational expertise as well providing guidance to the companies based on his significant knowledge of all aspects of the production and sale of nanotechnology enhanced-performance products.
Jaqueline M. Soptick is our Chief Accounting Officer. Ms. Soptick has been with our subsidiary Applied Nanotech, Inc. since 2001 and has been its Controller since 2002. From April 15, 2014 until the end August that year, she served as the Chief Accounting Officer of our predecessor, Applied Nanotech Holdings, Inc.
With her understanding of our operations Ms. Soptick will bring practical experience to the role as well as accounting skills.
Howard Westerman is the Chief Executive Officer of JW Energy Company, a privately held energy development and energy services company headquartered in Dallas, Texas. Mr. Westerman joined JW Energy Company in 1978 and became CEO in 1999. Under his leadership as CEO, the Company’s revenues increased from approximately $70 million to $1 Billion. Mr. Westerman also serves on numerous charitable and community boards.
As a former executive of an operating company, Mr. Westerman brings operations experience to our board, as well as financial acumen and the perspective of an investor.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to us under Rule 16a-3(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 and Forms 5 and amendments thereto furnished to us with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, as well as any written representation from a reporting person that no Form 5 is required, we are not aware that any officer, director or 10% or greater shareholder failed to file on a timely basis, as disclosed in the aforementioned Forms, reports required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 with the exception of Mr. Berman who was late in filing with respect to some shares purchased on January 4, 2017 that were reported in a filing on January 9, 2017, and Mr. Berman was late in filing with respect to purchases made on January 13 (filed January 23), purchases made on January 25 (filed January 30), purchases made on February 1 (filed February 6), purchases made on February 14, 15 and 17 (filed February 22), purchases made on February 28 and March 1 (filed March 6), purchases made on March 17 (filed March 24), purchases made on June 24 (filed June 28), purchases made on August 2 (filed August 7), purchases made on August 9 (filed August 14), purchases made on September 27 (filed on Oct 2), purchases made on October 4 (filed October 10), purchases made on Oct 18 (filed October 23) and purchases made on December 4 and 5 (filed December 11).
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our executive officers and other employees. A copy of the Code of Ethics will be sent, free of charge, to any person who sends a written request for a copy to Jeanne Rickert, Secretary, PEN Inc., 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1550, Miami, Florida 33131.
Board Leadership Structure and Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
Our Chief Executive Officer also serves as the Chairman of our board of directors and we have not designated any of our independent directors as a “lead director.” Our board of directors believes that by combining the role of Chairman with the Chief Executive Officer, the Company will unify under one vision to better focus its limited resources. Because of his background, our Chairman brings to the Board and to the task a perspective that combines the operational experience of a member of management with the oversight focus of a member of the Board.
Risk is inherent within every business, and how well a business manages risk can ultimately determine its success. We face a variety of risks, including credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, strategic risk and reputation risk. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks we face, while the Board has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. Taking its risk oversight role, the Board of Directors has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate and functioning as designed. To do this, our directors meet regularly with management to discuss strategy and risks we face.
Board Committees and Director Independence
Our securities are not quoted on an exchange that requires a majority of our Board members to be independent and we are not currently otherwise subject to any law, rule or regulation requiring that all or any portion of our Board of Directors include “independent” directors, nor are we required to establish or maintain an Audit Committee or other committee of our Board of Directors. Our board has determined that Messrs. Berman and Westerman are “independent” as defined by the NASDAQ Marketplace rules.
The Board does not have standing compensation or nominating committees. The Board does not believe these committees are necessary based on the size of our company, the current levels of compensation to corporate officers and the voting control exercised by Mr. Rickert due to his control over the Class B common stock. We will consider establishing compensation and nominating committees at the appropriate time.
The entire Board of Directors participates in the consideration of compensation issues relating to the Chairman and CEO. Candidates for director nominees are reviewed in the context of the current composition of the Board and the operating and strategic challenges that we face in the next few years. In conducting this assessment, we consider skills, diversity, age, and such other factors as it deems appropriate given the current needs of the Board and our company, to maintain a balance of knowledge, experience and capability. The process for identifying and evaluating nominees for director, including nominees recommended by stockholders, will involve compiling names of potentially eligible candidates, conducting background and reference checks, conducting interviews with the candidate and others (as schedules permit), We will seek out individuals with relevant experience to provide strategic guidance and to advise management as we operate our business and introduce new products.
In February 2016, the Board created an audit committee. It is charged with overseeing (1) the integrity of our financial statements and accounting and financial reporting processes; (2) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (3) the performance of our independent auditor and the qualifications and independence of that firm; (4) our system of disclosure, internal controls and compliance with our Code of Conduct. Howard Westerman is the sole director on the audit committee. He is not an audit committee financial expert.
Report of the Audit Committee
The audit committee (the “Committee”) oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including internal control systems. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the company’s audited financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Committee reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, including discussions of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.
In addition, the Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard No. 16 “Communications with audit Committees.” The Committee met with the independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of that firm’s examinations and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting. In addition, the Committee has reviewed and discussed with management management’s report on internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered accounting firm’s communications with the Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent registered accounting firm the independence of that firm.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions described in this report, the Committee recommends to the Board of the Directors (and the Board has approved) the inclusion of the audited financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 filed with the SEC.
To nominate candidates for service as a director on our board a stockholder must hold at least $2,000 in value of shares entitled to vote in the election of directors. Notice must be given not less than 60 or more than 90 days before the meeting. If less than 75-days’ notice is given of the date of the meeting, the stockholder’s notice is due not more than 10 days after notice of the meeting is given or after public disclosure of the date of the meeting, whichever is first. The notice must include information about a proposed candidate: the class and number of shares of stock held of record, owned beneficially and represented by proxy by the nominating shareholder or any person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, under common control with or acting in concert with the nominating shareholder (which we refer to as a “shareholder associated person”), and by each person to be nominated such information to be as of the record date for the meeting and as of the date of such notice; a description of all contracts, arrangements, understandings or relationships between (a) the shareholder making the nomination and any shareholder associated person that relate to the nomination, (b) the shareholder making the nomination and the proposed nominee and (c) the shareholder making the nomination, the proposed nominee or any shareholder associated person and any other person or persons that relate to the nomination.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The table below sets forth certain compensation information for: (i) our principal executive officer or other individual serving in a similar capacity during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017; (ii) our two most highly compensated executive officers other than our principal executive officer who were serving as executive officers at December 31, 2017 whose compensation exceed $100,000; and (iii) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been required but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer at December 31, 2017. Compensation information is shown for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016
We sometimes refer to these individuals to as the “named executive officers” as that term is defined under Rule 3b-7 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The value attributable to any stock or option awards is computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. None of our named executive officers received compensation in the form of Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation or Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings in fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016. The value of stock awards represents the grant date fair value of awards granted with respect to fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 in accordance with ASC Topic 718. Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. Our methodology, including its underlying estimates and assumptions used in calculating these values, is set forth in Note 2 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.
For stock awards, these shares were valued on the grant date based on the quoted trading price of the stock on such date. We did not grant any stock options to named executive officers in 2017 or 2016.
|Name & Principal Position||Year||Salary||Stock Awards||All Other Compensation||Total|
|Scott E. Rickert, Chief Executive (2)||2017||$||205,000||(2)||$||14,000||(3)||$||-||(3)||$|
|Jeanne M. Rickert, Secretary and General Counsel (5)||2017||$||150,000||(6)||$||14,000||(3)||$||-||$|
|(1)||Scott Rickert has served as our Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer since August 22, 2014. Before that, he served as CEO of Nanofilm and NanoHolding.|
|(2)||This column reflects salary earned for the year. Of this, $157,962 was paid in cash and the balance remains accrued and unpaid.|
|(3)||All directors are compensated for service on our Board. The compensation in this column reflects awards for attending Board meetings in 2017 and also stock awarded in satisfaction of fees accrued and unpaid for meetings attended in 2015 aggregating $6,000 to each of the Rickerts.|
|(4)||This column reflects salary earned for the year. Of this, $23,654 was paid in cash and the balance remains accrued and unpaid.|
|(5)||Jeanne Rickert has served as our Secretary and General Counsel since August 27, 2014. Previously, she served in those roles for Nanofilm and NanoHolding.|
|(6)||This column reflects salary earned for the year. Of this, $115,385 was paid in cash and the balance remains accrued and unpaid.|
Neither Scott or Jeanne Rickert has an employment agreement.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table
The following table provides information concerning unexercised options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer outstanding at December 31, 2017:
|Option Awards||Stock Awards|
|Name||Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised options - exercisable||Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options - unexercisable||Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options||Option Exercise Price ($)||Option Expiration Date||Number of Shares or Units of Stock that have not Vested||Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that have not Vested(1)||Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights hat have not Vested (2)||Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or other Rights that have not Vested (1)|
|Scott E Rickert||(1||)||$||(1||)|
|Jeanne M. Rickert|
|(1)||Mr. Rickert holds 8,250 equity credits under the Pen Brands Equity Credit Program. Those equity credits can convert into 6,476 shares of PEN common stock. See Note 13 to our Consolidated Financial Statements and Note 16.|
We paid our directors the amounts shown below during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. Amounts paid to Scott Rickert are shown in the summary Compensation Table for named executive officers.
earned or paid in cash
|Ronald J. Berman||$||0||$||10,000||-0-||-0-||$||10,000|
|Douglas Q. Holmes||$||0||$||10,000||-0-||-0-||$||10,000|
|(1)||No option awards were made to Directors or executive officers in 2017 or 2016. Mr. Berman holds options for 1,744 shares and Mr. Westerman holds options for 1,059 shares from prior period grants.|
All directors are compensated for 2017 with a fee of $2,000 per meeting. The fee is payable in shares of our Class A common stock, except that the Rickerts receive shares of Class B common stock instead of Class A shares. In 2017, each director also agreed to accept stock in lieu of cash for $2,000 of director fees from 2015 that were accrued and unpaid.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Equity Compensation Plans
See table and related explanations under item 5 above regarding Equity Compensation Plans.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Set forth in the following table is the indicated information as of June 4, 2018 with respect to (1) each person who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our Class A common stock, (2) each person who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our Class B common stock, (3) each person who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our Class Z common stock.
|Title of Class||Name and address of beneficial owner||
Amount and nature
|Class A common stock||Ronald J. Berman PEN Inc. 701 Brickell Ave., Suite 1550 Miami, FL 33131||260,036||15||%|
|Scott E. Rickert PEN Inc. 701 Brickell Ave., Suite 1550 Miami, FL 33131||131,731||(1)||8%|
|Class B common stock||Scott E. Rickert PEN Inc. 701 Brickell Ave., Suite 1550 Miami, FL 33131||1,417,468||(2)||99||%|
|(1)||As the sole general partner of Rickert Family, Limited partnership, Mr. Rickert has voting and investment power over the 131,731 shares of Class A common stock held by the partnership. Mr. Rickert disclaims beneficial ownership of 87,821 shares for which he does not have a pecuniary interest.|
|(2)||As the sole general partner of Rickert Family, Limited partnership, Mr. Rickert has voting and investment power over the 1,392,768 shares of Class B common stock held by the partnership. Mr. Rickert disclaims beneficial ownership of 928,512 shares for which he does not have a pecuniary interest.|
Set forth in the table below is information as of June 4, 2018 with respect to the beneficial ownership of Class A and Class B common stock by our directors and Named Executive Officers.
|Name of Beneficial Owner||
Title of Class of
Percent of Class
of Class B common
Percent of Class
of all Class B
|Ronald J Berman||Class A||260,036||15||%||8||%|
|Douglas Q. Holmes||Class A||14,654||(5||)||(5||)|
|Jeanne M. Rickert (3)||Class A||43,910||3||%||16||%|
|Scott E. Rickert (4)||Class A||131,731||8||%||49||%|
|Jacqueline M. Soptick||Class A||2,436||(5||)||(5||)|
|Howard Westerman||Class A||39,889||2||%||1||%|
|All directors and officers as a group||Class A||448,746|